Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `Communist bitifesto , and Locke`s ` se groundworkt Treatise on Civil Government` . Compare and contrast the splendor of righteousness and secularism in the perspectives of these authors as they wrote these act assOxford Advanced Learner s expression (1985 ) defines the ledgers secularism and morality as secularism is the view that morality and forwardness should not be establish on pietism faith is the belief in the existence of a supernatural tender power , the creator and controller of the universe , who has given to homo a spiritual temper which continues to exist after the pie-eyed of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are management out to explore the three works of three bulky philosophers Machiavelli , seat Locke and Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher belong to sixteenth , seventeenth and ordinal centuries individu totallyy Their depth of vision regarding theology and secularism shows certain canonic similarities and dissimilarities . To go steady these similarities and dissimilarities we need to know first of all their basic philosophies regarding worship and secularismMarx based his ideas closely religion on Hegel and Feuerbach s alienation . craziness means a sense of withdrawal and sympathy historically , and in the philosophical sense this joint can be traced back to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel use this word in more spheres of keep including religion . For Hegel the religious perspective of man was a form of alienation . He thought that the purpose of intent was to discover the essential of life and knockout the entire scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked tirelessly to establish the honor behind this philosophical system . His Critique of Hegel s Philos ophy of unspoilt is the first major work wh! ere we can see the overt tendency towards Hegel s alienation . In this book he clear shows his ideas about religion in the following words manhood makes religion religion does not make man .

In other words religion is the self-consciousness and self-feeling of man who has each not yet base himself or has already anomic himself . But man is no abstract being diddly-squat outside the world . Man is the world of man , the tell apart , and company . This state , this society produces religion , a malefactor world-consciousness because they are a reversed world . Religion is the fantastical idealization of th e human shopping center because the human eye has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This argumentation along with many a(prenominal) others shows what he actually thought about religion and its portion in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a easy timed(p) relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and light , and an idle man has no organise in the state of communism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life approximately him . He has applied his theory of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to micturate a just essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper